.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

UK Against Fluoridation

Monday, October 31, 2022

F.A.N. Newsletter

 Dear bill,

BIG NEWS! The Court ruled in favor of our motion, and the lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in federal court is moving forward, bringing us another step closer to a final ruling.

If you missed Wednesday's exciting hearing in federal court, you will be able to watch it.  The court recorded the proceedings and will release it to the public. I was waiting to include a link to the recording in this bulletin, but it hasn't been released yet. When it is, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) will immediately share it with you in an email and on social media. Stay tuned!  In the meantime, here's what happened.

At the end of the initial trial in June of 2020, the Court put a stay/abeyance on the proceedings, wanting to wait for the National Toxicology Program (NTP) to finalize its review of the science on fluoride and human neurotoxicity. At the time, lawyers for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) told the Court that the review would be forthcoming, and based on the NTP's typical review process, the delay on our trial ought to have been short-lived. However, in unprecedented fashion, the NTP has subjected their fluoride report to at least three separate peer-reviews, with a fourth currently ongoing. This is in contrast to previous NTP Monographs on other chemicals, where there has only been one public peer-review culminating in a public vote by a panel of scientists. More than two-years after the Court was assured a final document, the NTP has yet to publish one.

FAN and our attorneys felt that we had waited patiently for long enough. Prior to Wednesday's hearing, our attorneys filed a motion asking the Court to take the case out of abeyance and to hold a second trial where our experts can comment on the latest scientific studies, including existing versions of the NTP review. If the Court wasn't inclined to hold a second phase of the trial, we also expressed support for a ruling based on the existing record rather than continue waiting for the NTP.

The EPA objected to ending the stay, preferring the Court to either wait for the final NTP review or make a ruling based on the existing court record. The EPA were not in favor of reopening the trial to more expert testimony, new evidence, or any version of the NTP report but the "final" version, if one is ever published. That timeline would have likely delayed the trial into late 2023 or beyond.   

On Wednesday, the Court ruled in favor of our motion to lift the stay on the proceedings. Not only did this signal the Court's desire to move forward with our case, but the Court specifically reopened discovery so attorneys and the Court could examine an updated version of the NTP's review, without it needing to be published. The EPA's objections to using any version of the NTP report besides the "final" version was based on their concern that the NTP's findings would be made public prematurely. To circumvent this objection, the Court placed the NTP's review under protective order so that it will only be available to the parties involved, the Court, and expert witnesses. The public will not have access unless the Court decides otherwise, or if FAN wins a separate pending legal case on our Freedom of Information Act Request (FOIA) for the report.

Thankfully, the Court made it clear to both parties that it expects to be provided with the NTP review before the next status hearing set for early January, regardless of what process is used to get it. The Court urged both parties to come together and find a way to get the current NTP review into the Court's hands "voluntarily," but our attorney, Michael Connett, was also told that if he needs the Court's help "using subpoenas or a motion to compel," he knows where to find the Judge. This was another victory for our side, as the Court clearly agreed with our argument that the updated NTP draft was worth looking at, and took action to obtain it.

In agreement with FAN's position, the Court reiterated its preference for a phase-two of the trial, with additional expert testimony. The Court also wants the NTP Director to explain in detail the remaining timeline for publishing their "final" review and the criteria for determining whether the review will be published or not.

Once the Court has the NTP review, the Judge will read it, as well as consider the NTP Director's responses to his questions. A determination will then be made whether to wait a little longer for the NTP to publish a "final" report, or admit the NTP draft as evidence, allowing us to immediately move the trial into the next phase.  

We should find out at the next status hearing, scheduled for Tuesday, January 10, at 2:30PM (Pacific). 

  • For more information about lawsuit, including a trial timeline and documents, click here.
     
  • For more information on the NTP's Review, click here.

Thank you for your continued support,

Stuart Cooper
Executive Director
Fluoride Action Network

Saturday, October 29, 2022

Friday, October 28, 2022

From Ann Wills

 We finally watched the ITV documentary “Bodies of Evidence” about surgeon Ian Paterson who operated on over 11,000 women for breast cancer - many of them unnecessarily, as they didn’t have cancer & he knew they didn’t.  He lied to them, telling them they had cancer. He also operated on some men for cancer which they didn’t have.  They were put through unnecessary operations & radiotherapy, leaving them with very large scars.

Spire Hospital (private) where he worked from, along with NHS hospitals, wouldn’t take any responsibility at first, saying he just hired one of their rooms.  After decades of campaigning by the women, they at last got their case listened to & an Inquiry was led by Rt. Rev. Graham James, Bishop of Norwich, which found in the women’s favour.  Many of the women remain traumatised & unable to trust doctors.  It was screened on ITV on 15.6.22.

Ann 

Thursday, October 27, 2022

 fluoride fluoridation : 1 Lords debate

Water Fluoridation (Consultation) (England) Regulations 2022 - Motions to Approve

26 Oct 2022

Water Fluoridation (Consultation) (England) Regulations 2022 - Motions to Approve

Wednesday, October 26, 2022

 That the draft Water Fluoridation (Consultation) (England) Regulations 2022, which were laid before this House on 20 July, be approved.—(Jacob Young.)

Question agreed to.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 118(6)),

Tuesday, October 25, 2022

F.A.N. News letter

 IMPORTANT REMINDER: The next status hearing for our federal TSCA lawsuit against the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to end the use of fluoridation chemicals will be held TOMORROW, on Wednesday, October 26th at 3:30PM (US Pacific) / 6:30 (US Eastern).

Watch the trial live on Zoom:

https://cand-uscourts.zoomgov.com/j/1619911861?pwd=TjVma1lnMlJlNHR3ZE9QMkFjNkFndz09

Webinar ID: 161 991 1861
Password: 912881

We're expecting this hearing to be more than an update from both parties. FAN's attorneys filed a motion asking the Court to take the case out of abeyance and either restart it with an abbreviated second trial to review the latest scientific studies, or to make a final ruling. We feel there is enough evidence available from the publicly available draft NTP reports and from other materials since the trial in June 2020 to complete the case and for the Court to render a decision.  We’re confident the evidence is also strongly in our favor, including from the NTP’s review.

It’s time for justice to be served, and we’re hoping that Wednesday's hearing will bring us closer to that end.

Thank you for your continued support,

Stuart Cooper
Executive Director
Fluoride Action Network

Dr Mercola

 

The Fact Check Scam

Blaylock also reviews how truth has been suppressed while falsehoods have flourished during these COVID years:

“The designers of this pandemic anticipated a pushback by the public and that major embarrassing questions would be asked. To prevent this, the controllers fed the media a number of tactics, one of the most commonly used was and is the ‘fact check’ scam ...

When sources are in fact revealed they are invariably the corrupt CDC, WHO or Anthony Fauci or just their opinion. Here is a list of things that were labeled as ‘myths’ and ‘misinformation’ that were later proven to be true.

  • The asymptomatic vaccinated are spreading the virus equally as with unvaccinated symptomatic infected.
  • The vaccines cannot protect adequately against new variants, such as Delta and Omicron.
  • Natural immunity is far superior to vaccine immunity and is most likely lifelong.
  • Vaccine immunity not only wanes after several months, but all immune cells are impaired for prolonged periods, putting the vaccinated at a high risk of all infections and cancer.
  • COVID vaccines can cause a significant incidence of blood clots and other serious side effects.
  • The vaccine proponents will demand numerous boosters as each variant appears on the scene.
  • Fauci will insist on the COVID vaccine for small children and even babies.
  • Vaccine passports will be required to enter a business, fly in a plane, and use public transportation.
  • There will be internment camps for the unvaccinated (as in Australia, Austria and Canada).
  • The unvaccinated will be denied employment.
  • There are secret agreements between the government, elitist institutions, and vaccine makers.
  • Many hospitals were either empty or had low occupancy during the pandemic.
  • The spike protein from the vaccine enters the nucleus of the cell, altering cell DNA repair function.
  • Hundreds of thousands have been killed by the vaccines and many times more have been permanently damaged.
  • Early treatment could have saved the lives of most ... who died.
  • Vaccine-induced myocarditis (which was denied initially) is a significant problem and clears over a short period.
  • Special deadly lots (batches) of these vaccines are mixed with the mass of other COVID-19 vaccines.”

Blaylock goes on to review COVID jab hazards, evidence of “hot lots,” the unprecedented lack of autopsies being done on people who die shortly post-jab, Pfizer’s deceptive trial practices, the shameful vilification of useful drugs, going even so far as to fabricate studies to make them look deadly, the dangers of the COVID jab during pregnancy, the skyrocketing excess mortality post-jab and much more.

It’s a fairly long article, but well worth reading through for a summary of where we’ve been — and where we’re headed.

Monday, October 24, 2022

Sunday, October 23, 2022

Saturday, October 22, 2022

Friday, October 21, 2022

F.A.N.

 


The IOM and Southampton both rejected fluoridation but once again they're back

New fight to stop mass fluoridation

This article is more than 13 years old
Government drive to add the chemical to water supplies hinges on Hampshire test case








 15 Feb 2009 00.01 GMT
Opponents of the mass fluoridation of water will next week try to stop a government drive to add the chemical to supplies used by millions of people in England and Wales.

IOM Public Health Directorate 2022

VICTORY AT LAST!

On Thursday June 12th 2008 the IOM DHSS announced via press release that they have officially abandoned all plans to fluoridate the Manx water supply, the decision was backed by the Council of Ministers.

The efforts to fluoridate the Manx water supply began back in September 2003 so this represents the end of a 5 year battle.

2022



Key priorities for action

WE WILL:

a) Engage with stakeholders to revisit and review fluoridation of the

water supply on the Isle of Man.

b) Work in partnership with DESC and other stakeholders to establish

a standardised food and drink policy for schools and childhood

settings in line with the Children's Weight Management strategy.

c) Engage with the leads of non-government children’s clubs/

organisations to raise awareness of, and encourage health food

and drink options.

d) Ensure access to routine and urgent dental care for children at

high risk of poor oral health.

e) Integrate oral health into targeted home visits by health visitors

and social workers.

in the House of Commons at 1:49 pm on 20th October 2022.

Photo of Peter AldousPeter Aldous Conservative, Waveney

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his intervention, which came at an appropriate time. Indeed, he may well have been reading my speech, because that was the next point I was coming to. In the short term, we need to be stepping up recruitment from abroad. Although the legislation tabled earlier this month to streamline the process of recognising overseas qualifications is welcome, that will not address the problem on its own, and I hope that when he responds to the debate, the Minister will address that issue. In the longer term, we must improve dentistry training ourselves and ensure that it is available throughout the country. In that regard, the proposals being worked up by the Universities of East Anglia and of Suffolk are to be welcomed.

Thirdly, as my right hon. Friend Dr Murrison said, there is a need for a new NHS dental contract. It is welcome that discussions have started on revising the contract, but there is a worry that the Government are looking only at marginal changes, when ultimately a completely new contract is required. At present, the NHS contract is driving dentists away from doing NHS work. Its target-based approach is soul destroying for so many, and it needs to be replaced with an agreement that has prevention at its core.

That leads me to the fourth and penultimate component of a new system of NHS dentistry: the public promotion of the importance of good oral health, and looking after our teeth from the cradle to the grave. Denplan proposes that the Government and NHS should lead a public education campaign to emphasise the importance of oral health. There should be provision in the aforementioned new contract for dentists to go into schools, as well as into care and nursing homes. When economic conditions allow, let us be imaginative and exempt children’s toothbrushes and toothpaste from VAT. That can embed good oral healthcare at an early stage of life. It is welcome that the Health and Care Act 2022 facilitates the roll-out of water fluoridation projects, and the Government should work proactively with water companies to ensure that is universal.

Finally, there is a need for clear transparency and full local accountability for overseeing and commissioning NHS dentistry services. I acknowledge the hard work and great effort of those working at NHS England, but we need to replace a system that is inaccessible, opaque, and confusing. The Health and Care Act provides us with the means of doing that, and it is welcome that from next April, many integrated care systems will be taking on responsibility for local NHS dentistry. That is the right approach, as good oral healthcare is essential for good general health and wellbeing, and inextricably linked to primary, mental and emergency care. It is vital that those involved in dentistry are represented on integrated care boards.

Across the country there are a multitude of dental deserts. If we do nothing, if we apply the odd sticking plaster here and there, those will turn into one large Sahara. We owe it to those we represent to ensure that does not happen. That means that we need as a matter of urgency a blueprint plan for new NHS dentistry. That will not be delivered in one fell swoop, but we need clearly to lay down the route path and start taking meaningful strides down it. With that in mind, the motion calls on the Government to embark on that journey and report back on their progress in three months’ time.

Dr Mercola

 As soon as it was announced that COVID-19 would be combated with novel mRNA gene transfer technology, a number of scientists spoke out against it with dire warnings about potential health ramifications, including the theory that fertility might be adversely impacted.

In the two years since the rollout of these COVID shots, our worst fears have come true. Still, mainstream media feign surprise. Case in point: The Washington Post recently reported that “Pregnancy complications spiked during the pandemic” and “no one knows exactly why.”1

Aside from COVID-19 itself, the COVID shots are the only thing that has impacted a vast majority of the population worldwide during this timeframe, and everywhere the same effects are reported. To claim “no one knows why” is to ignore the proverbial elephant in the room as its tail is swatting you in the face and its trumpet sound threatens to shatter your eardrums.

Thursday, October 20, 2022

 

Upcoming Business - Commons: General Committee

24 Oct 2022

Second Delegated Legislation Committee: The draft Water Fluoridation (Consultation) (England) Regulations 2022. Debate; 6:00 pm – 9:00 pm; Room 9, Palace of Westminster

Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Friday, October 14, 2022

Thursday, October 13, 2022

Wednesday, October 12, 2022

Toxic Torts: An Interview With Fluoridation Chemical Expert Gary Pittman

 Dear Friends,

IMPORTANT NOTE: The next status hearing for our federal TSCA lawsuit was originally scheduled for October 20th, however the Court has now pushed it back a week to Wednesday, October 26th at 3:30PM (US Pacific) / 6:30 (US Eastern). We will keep you updated as the hearing approaches and provide Zoom login information so you can watch from home.

We have a special feature for our supporters today!  Several weeks ago, members of the Fluoride Action Network had the opportunity to interview Gary O. Pittman on the connection between the phosphate industry and the fluoride chemicals that are added to drinking water in the United States. Gary spent a career as an industry consultant and phosphate plant manager for Occidental Chemical Corporation (now called OXY) at their mining and processing operations in northern Florida. This industry is the primary "producer" of fluorosilicic acid, which is a toxic waste product captured by their pollution scrubber systems and distributed to towns and cities across the U.S. for use in the public water supplies as "fluoride." 

Pittman is the author of the book Phosphate Fluorides, Toxic Torts, and appears in the recent film about the Florida fertilizer industry, Phosfate.

This hour-long interview features a wide-ranging discussion on: 

* How phosphates are mined 
* Toxic chemicals at the phosphate plant 
* How fluoride is captured from from phosphate rock slurry 
* Why defoamers are used in the process
* Toxic work conditions that impacted the health of workers and the environment 
* The financial and political influence of the chemical industry. 

We hope that you enjoy it and share the links with your contacts and anyone who may be interested in knowing where fluoridation chemicals come from.

Dr Mercola



Just in: More Proof the COVID Shots Can Kill These two doctors claim they've discovered a way to test for spike protein in human tissue, and they've found spike protein in individuals who were injured or died from the shots. For this report, clear evidence of the body fatally attacking itself, including the heart, was found in 14 out of 15 bodies.

Sunday, October 09, 2022

Saturday, October 08, 2022

Friday, October 07, 2022

Thursday, October 06, 2022

Wednesday, October 05, 2022

Tuesday, October 04, 2022

Monday, October 03, 2022

View from 14 minutes

Sunday, October 02, 2022

Canadian actress Jennifer Gibson says she has Bell's Palsy "two weeks after" the jabbity jab, says she would "do it again

 

A Wills awills@willsfamily.org.uk via outbound.mailhop.org 

18:35 (1 minute ago)
to awills

I completely agree with Maggie.  For several reasons we must keep these 2 subjects separate.   Ann

-

“… whatever you may think about vaccination, it's a massive mistake to link this in any way to fluoridation. The fastest way to suggest we're crazy conspiracy theorists is to say "fluoride" and "Covid vaccine" in the same breath. We _must_ simply fight one battle, the one we do know a lot about, and not disappear down the rabbit hole of other issues.   Fluoride: let's focus, please.” Maggie.


I disagree I haven't had any jabs as I researched from the start. People are getting suspicious now about the safe and effective litany. Less and less want to take another booster shot.

Knowing how those pushing fluoridation  lie do you believe Anthony Fauci

If people don't wake up they will conjure up another virus to lock us down again

Bill

Saturday, October 01, 2022

 

Dr Michael Goldman, 67, of Erasme Hospital in Brussels, was diagnosed with lymphoma - cancer of the immune system - last summer.

Dr Mercola

 New Booster Sets off up to 98x the Adverse Events It Fixes

It's true. According to a recent risk-benefit analysis it will cause 18 to 98 serious adverse events for each hospitalization it prevents, yet Biden just ordered 171 million doses based on a study of 8 mice, despite the fact they haven't even released the data.