Written Questions Parliament

Lord Storey Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Education)

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the United States’ National Toxicology Program’s report State of the Science Concerning Fluoride Exposure, dated September 2022.

Lord Markham The Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Health and Social Care

The Department notes that this paper is still in draft and that according to the United States National Toxicology Programme (NTP) website, which was updated on 15 March 2023, the NTP is going through an internal process to decide on final publication.

We also note that earlier drafts of the paper were reviewed by the US National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (US NASEM). At the time, the US NASEM stated that the review cannot be used to draw conclusions on effects at lower levels of fluoride, i.e., below the United Kingdom regulatory limit for fluoride of 1.5 milligram per litre. This means that the findings of the US NTP draft review could not be used to draw conclusions relevant to existing water fluoridation schemes in the UK.

Dr Mercola

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• In December 2013, Zaire Ebola hemorrhagic fever broke out in Guinea and over the next three years spread across West Africa, ultimately killing 11,323 people. It was the largest and deadliest Ebola outbreak in history
• According to a paper published at the end of December 2014, the Ebola epidemic was traced back to a 2-year-old boy in Meliandou, Guinea. Supposedly, the boy had come in contact with an infected fruit bat in a hollowed-out tree. However, no Ebolavirus was ever detected in any of the bat samples collected from the area
• The senior author on that 2014 paper was Fabian Leendertz, a renowned virus hunter with the Robert Koch Institute in Germany. Leendertz was also a member of the World Health Organization team that investigated the origin of COVID-19, concluding without evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was of zoonotic origin
• In late October 2022, Sam Husseini and Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., published a new analysis, in which they highlighted the holes in the zoonotic origin narrative and laid out the evidence pointing to a lab leak
• Curiously, many of the same individuals, companies and organizations involved in the Ebola epidemic have also been linked to the alleged creation of SARS-CoV-2

A 2021 video of Dr. Anthony Fauci going door to door with an entourage that included Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser has gone viral two years later, in March 2023. The video shows Fauci and the mayor trying to convince residents to take the COVID mRNA shots.

The residents, however, are nowhere near convinced they should roll up their sleeves, even when Fauci insists the technology for the shot has been studied for more than 20 years, and that even in the “very, very, very rare chance that you do get it even if you're vaccinated … you don't even feel sick. It's like you don't even know you got infected. It's very, very good at protecting you.”

The Daily Mail noted that, at the time, the mayor’s website was reporting “at least 60,000 breakthrough COVID cases in the city.”

Bowser’s chastising of one man who questions the idea of offering monetary incentives to get the shot doesn’t gain ground, either. “Your campaign is about fear. It's about inciting fear in people. You all attack people with fear. That's what this pandemic is. It's a fear, it's fear, this pandemic. That's all it is,” the man says.

Fauci’s response is to blame Republicans for the vaccine resistance. “It's so crazy,” he says to Bowser. “I mean, they're not doing it because they say they don't want to do it. They're Republicans. They don't like to be told what to do. And we got to break that, unpack that,’ he says.

VERY SCARY IF YOU'VE HAD THE JAB

ENTERTAINMENT & ARTS

Diamond of Diamond and Silk, a pro-Trump podcaster and video blogger, dies at 51

Jan. 10, 2023

Bombshell! Blocked Government Report CONFIRMS Fluoride Lowers IQ in Children

 

Biden health officials suppressed a government study confirming that fluoride exposure causes detrimental effects to the developing brain, internal government emails and reports released through a lawsuit show.

The conclusive meta-analysis by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) released last week through a lawsuit by Fluoride Action Network (FAN) shows that prenatal and early-life fluoride exposure reduces IQ in children.

F.A.N. News letter

 `

National Toxicology Program Find’s No Safe Level of Fluoride in Drinking Water; Water Fluoridation Policy Threatened

After a 6-year long systematic review of fluoride’s impact on the developing brain, a court order has led to the National Toxicology Program (NTP) making public their finalized report that was blocked by US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) leadership and concealed from the public for the past 10 months. The NTP reported 52 of 55 studies found decreases in child IQ associated with increase in fluoride, a remarkable 95% consistency. The NTP’s report says:   “Our meta-analysis confirms results of previous meta-analyses and extends them by including newer, more precise studies with individual-level exposure measures. The data support a consistent inverse association between fluoride exposure and children's IQ.”   A meta-analysis is when information from all the relevant studies are combined to get a fuller and unbiased overall picture, rather than just looking at individual studies in isolation.   The NTP’s meta-analysis also put the magnitude of harm into perspective:   "[R]esearch on other neurotoxicants has shown that subtle shifts in IQ at the population level can have a profound impact on the number of people who fall within the high and low ranges of the population's IQ distribution. For example, a 5-point decrease in a population's IQ would nearly double the number of people classified as intellectually disabled.”   So, while an average drop of 5 IQ points in a population might sound small it is huge from a public health perspective. Furthermore, the NTP acknowledged there was the potential for some people to be more susceptible than average [use NTP quote], so those people could lose much more than 5 IQ points. Those susceptible individuals could lose 10, 15, 20 or more IQ points which would likely cause profound lifetime negative consequences.    The five independent peer-reviewers of the NTP report all voted to accept the review’s main conclusion and lauded the report. Their comments include: “what you have done is state-of-the-art”; “the analysis itself is excellent, and you thoroughly addressed comments”; “Well done!”; “Findings… were interpreted objectively”.   The newly released documents include comments from the NTP’s own experts confirming that the report’s conclusion that fluoride can lower IQ does apply to communities with water fluoridation programs.  NTP report says the evidence is not just in those who drink water with higher fluoride concentrations exceeding the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended maximum level of 1.5 mg/L. Furthermore, the WHO guideline was set in 1984 to protect against more severe forms of dental fluorosis and neurotoxicity was never considered. Few neurotoxicity studies even existed in 1984.   In numerous responses to comments by reviewers of the report, the NTP made clear that they had found evidence that exposures of at least some people in areas with fluoridated water at 0.7 mg/L were associated with lower child IQ.   For example, when an unnamed government fluoridation proponent claimed:   "The data do not support the assertion of an effect below 1.5 mg/L…all conclusory statements in this document should be explicit that any findings from the included studies only apply to water fluoride concentrations above 1.5 mg/L."   The NTP responded:   "We do not agree with this comment…our assessment considers fluoride exposures from all sources, not just water…because fluoride is also found in certain foods, dental products, some pharmaceuticals, and other sources… Even in the optimally fluoridated cities…individual exposure levels…suggest widely varying total exposures from water combined with fluoride from other sources."   Additional NTP responses about the review’s relevance to water fluoridation programs:   "We have no basis on which to state that our findings are not relevant to some children or pregnant people in the United States."   "Several of the highest quality studies showing lower IQs in children were done in optimally fluoridated (0.7 mg/L) areas…many urinary fluoride measurements exceed those that would be expected from consuming water that contains fluoride at 1.5 mg/L."   The NTP also responded to commenters asking whether their meta-analysis had identified any safe exposure threshold, below which there would be no loss of IQ.   The NTP responded that they found “no obvious threshold” for either total fluoride exposure or water fluoride exposure, referring to a graph in the meta-analysis (NTP’s eFigure 17 reproduced below) showing that as water fluoride concentration increased from 0.0 to 1.5 mg/L there was a steep drop in IQ of about 7 points (expressed as “standardized mean difference” units in the graphs). An external peer-reviewer commented on the size of the IQ loss: “Wow … that is substantial … That’s a big deal.” {p 1060}

The graph uses standardized mean difference (SMD) units where each -1.0 SMD is equivalent to about -15 IQ points.    In the left-hand graph each circle represents a study. Several have mean water fluoride below 1.5 mg/L. The right-hand graph shows the relationship between fluoride concentration and loss of IQ when all the studies are pooled. This analysis, based on many studies, is strong evidence that fluoride is associated with a substantial loss of IQ at levels of exposure common in people drinking artificially fluoridated water, and there is no observable threshold indicating a “safe” dose.   They NTP’s experts further stated that the science showing neurotoxic harm “is a large, consistent and growing database."   Overall, the report provides strong evidence that fluoride is associated with a substantial loss of IQ at levels of exposure common in people drinking fluoridated water.   PLEASE SHARE THE ONLINE PRESS RELEASE VERSION OF THIS BULLETIN WITH LOCAL MEDIA OUTLETS.   STAY TUNED! We will be sending out additional bulletins on the NTP report in the coming days.

DR Mercola. What Will Happen in 10 years?

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• So far, children have been largely unfazed by COVID-19 because their interferon pathway works really well. Interferon is an immune molecule that protects cells against invading pathogens
• The COVID jab inhibits the type-1 interferon pathway, so mass injecting young children may actually erase the natural herd immunity against COVID-19 that would develop if all children remained unjabbed
• Aggressive cancers have exploded among adults who got the shots, even though it’s only been a little over two years since their rollout
• Analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) data suggests the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is redesignating cancer deaths as COVID deaths to eliminate the cancer signal, and has been doing so since April 2021
• We’ve also seen massive increases in excess mortality from abnormal clotting issues and heart problems since the COVID shots rolled out. If side effects such as cancer, heart disease and stroke are killing working age adults in unprecedented numbers already, what will the excess mortality be, say, 10 years from now if children and teens keep getting mRNA boosters every year?

The Exposè

FACT CHECK: Member of House of Lords uses Mainstream Media to claim that “Antivaxers are a global menace who must be defeated”; So why did the Triple+ Vaccinated account for 92% of all COVID Deaths in 2022? And why are Mortality Rates per 100k LOWEST among the Unvaccinated (Antivaxxers)?

<

Dr Mercola

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• In a March 5, 2023, memorandum, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic laid out evidence showing Dr. Anthony Fauci prompted the creation of a paper to “disprove” the lab leak theory, and that the authors of this paper skewed available evidence to achieve that goal
• According to the Subcommittee, while Dr. Jeremy Farrar — former head of the Wellcome Trust and now chief scientist for the World Health Organization — is not credited as having had any involvement with the fabricated paper, evidence suggests he actually led the drafting process, and “made direct edits” to the paper
• The Telegraph has reviewed more than 100,000 leaked WhatsApp messages sent between health officials, ministers and other government officials, showing the British government was intentionally deploying scare tactics to force compliance with lockdowns and other COVID measures
• Then-health secretary Matt Hancock said he wanted to “deploy” a new COVID variant to “frighten the pants off” the public. One of his media advisers, Damon Poole, agreed with the plan, saying “Yep that’s what will get proper behavior change”
• The messages show officials mocking travelers forced into quarantine and other deplorable behaviors. They also show decisions were made on the fly, for political reasons rather than scientific ones

Dr Mercola

 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the experimental antiviral drug remdesivir, brand name Veklury, for emergency use against COVID-19 in May 2020.1 By October 2020, it had received full approval.2 It remains a primary treatment for COVID-19 in hospitals, despite research showing it lacks effectiveness3 and can cause high rates of organ failure.4

On Twitter, John Beaudoin is calling for a criminal investigation into the drug, citing data that it may have killed 100,000 people in the U.S. "They know," he says, "or they willfully refuse to know. Either way, it's homicide."5

Using drugs that cause organ failure, like remdesivir, isn't in the best interest of public health. The fact that U.S. health authorities have focused on this and similarly harmful drugs to the exclusion of all others, including older drugs with high rates of effectiveness and superior safety profiles, sends a very disturbing message.

Did Remdesivir Kill Thousands in Massachusetts?

Beaudoin has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court and believes a spike in deaths from acute renal failure (ARF) in Massachusetts is due to remdesivir, which is produced by Gilead Sciences. Using a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Beaudoin received all the death certificates in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022.

He then graphed the FOIA data, finding 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure from January 1, 2021 to November 30, 2022. Beaudoin also revealed an increase in deaths from acute rental failure in every age group over 15 years old, from 2015 to 2022.6 "Thousands dead in Massachusetts ARF likely due to Remdesivir. This requires CRIMINAL investigation," he tweeted.7

F.A.N. Newsletter

Fluoride Overdosing Reported In Lancaster, Pennsylvania

Customers of the Lancaster, PA water system received 2.3 mg per liter fluoride in their water in late December, according to a report from February 3 on LancasterOnline. The level is nearly four times the government recommended concentration.

Dentistry Concerned Over Growing “Fluoride Hesitancy”

Reflecting a concern over the general public’s unwillingness to use fluoride in dental health, researchers from the University of Washington and other schools have tried to develop “a reliable and valid way to measure topical fluoride hesitancy.”

Lichen Proposed As Indicator Of Fluoride Air Pollution

The lichen Xanthoria Parietina is highly sensitive to fluoride exposure, making it a promising indicator of this type of air pollution, according to a group of Algerian microbiologists writing in the current issue of the Journal of Applied Biological Sciences.

Toronto Petition To Repeal Fluoridation Still Active

An online petition asking the Toronto City Council to repeal water fluoridation is still active and has collected over 7,600 signatures.

Dr Mercola

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Die Welt, a mainstream media outlet in Germany, revealed that numerous subjects who suffered adverse events, including deaths, during Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot trials were removed from the trial data
• A person known as “Pfizer subject C4591001 1162 11621327” died three days after receiving the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID shot, reportedly due to stroke and arteriosclerosis; it was deemed unrelated to the shots
• The CDC has since warned that people ages 65 and older who received Pfizer’s updated (bivalent) COVID-19 booster shot may be at increased risk of stroke
• Die Welt also revealed contradictions in Pfizer documents, adverse events from the shot downplayed and mass unblinding of study subjects, which wasn’t revealed in a later approval study
• In November 2020, Pfizer claimed their COVID-19 shot was 95% effective against COVID-19, but this was highly misleading and based on flawed methodology, including excluding people who got COVID-19 within 14 days after their first shot
• Pfizer has profited immensely despite the concerns, earning a record $100 billion in 2022, including $37.8 billion for its COVID-19 shots and $18.9 billion for its antiviral drug Paxlovid

Dr Mercola

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• For nearly two years, there was a complete ban on discussing the COVID-19 lab leak theory
• Facebook reversed its censorship policy on the lab leak theory in June 2021. Now, mainstream media are forced to admit the pandemic was most likely caused by a lab leak
• January 28, 2023, epidemiologists Colin Butler and Delia Randolph published a joint statement saying a lab leak is the most likely source of COVID-19. The two had previously authored separate reports for the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), which commissioned them to investigate the possibility of the pandemic being the result of “humanity’s abuse of nature”
• February 26, 2023, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Energy Department has now revised its assessment of the origin of SARS-CoV-2, concluding the pandemic “most likely arose from a laboratory leak”
• The FBI also concluded a lab leak was the most likely scenario all the way back in 2021, yet played a central role in censoring anyone who suggested this is where COVID came from

Dr Mercola

 Two top scientists in virology who initially said they suspected the COVID virus was created in a lab, and who later suddenly did an about-face to say no, it couldn’t have been, “suddenly” were the recipients of multimillion dollar NIAID grants, after they made their new opinions public.

In 2020, Dr. Kristian Andersen of the Scripps Institute and Dr. Robert Garry of Tulane University initially told Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) they thought the lab leak concerns were legitimate. But they soon backpedalled and the live market theory became predominant.

Interestingly, it’s now been made public that after they changed their minds, from 2020 to 2022, Anderson and Garry suddenly had NIAID grants totalling $25.2 million at their fingertips.

In an interview with the Washington Examiner, Justin Goodman, vice president of advocacy and public policy at the White Coat Waste Project, said, “"Since changing their tune and publicly dismissing a potential lab leak following secretive conversations with Anthony Fauci, Garry and Andersen have received tens of millions in new taxpayer funds from the NIAID … for wasteful, deadly, and dangerous virus experiments on primates and other animals."

"Given all of the waste, fraud and abuse we’ve exposed at NIAID since early 2020, it wouldn’t be surprising if gain-of-function’s 'funding father' Anthony Fauci was rewarding his fellow animal experimenters for their compliance and complicity in covering up what really happened at the Wuhan lab."