.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

UK Against Fluoridation

Tuesday, November 07, 2017

Australia - Fluoridation of the Gunnedah Water Supply

.............Here comes the controversial conclusion!
If only minute quantities of not even highly concentrated fluoride, constantly maintained, produce maximum resistance to tooth decay, why have Fluoride in the drinking water at all?
And, why risk fluoride-embrittled bones by eating vegetables grown in fluoridated water or by consuming meats from animals drinking fluoridated water?
The original argument for mass fluoridation was to help the disadvantaged proportion of the population who could not afford dental treatment. The disadvantaged do not want brittle bones either! But even though prevention is still being better than cure, fluoridation will not cover for neglect and slow cavities can form despite diligent, self- applied cleaning, so some professional overview is still essential if the aim of “teeth for life” is to be realised.
To conclude, Council will save ratepayers from the costs and risks of an over-dosing of water supplies where Megalitres of water are loaded with tonnes of a toxic substance (an industrial waste product, actually) for the dubious beneficial reaction of one part per million – but only from the minute portion that is consumed as drinking water – and that benefit is lost through cumulative deposit in hard tissues of the body, unless it is spat out …so then what do we drink?
Gerald L Bartlett, B.D.S. Univ.Syd.; B.A.,U.N.E., Armidale
Gunnedah

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home