UK - Fluoridation: No evidence of safety
Fluoridation: No evidence of safety
Date: 10 August 2009
REGARDING the latest information on fluoridated water, many readers will not have realised that what has been deliberately missed out of this latest release, is the fact that it is calcium fluoride naturally occurring in Trent water that is mixing with good old Yorkshire water, not deliberately added sodium fluoride or hydrofluorosilic acid, which are powerful toxic untested waste products. Yorkshire water is, of course, purer because it is not tainted with such naturally occurring high levels o
Then we have fluoridated milk: why is this not treated with pharmaceutical grade calcium fluoride? As it is the least harmful type of fluoride, are our children not worth it? Why are children being encouraged to drink it when, according to science, only a token application is required to cause an effect? There is no independent scientific evidence to prove it is safe or efficacious?
The only advantage fluoridated milk has over fluoridating our water is that there is an element of choice.
Sodium fluoride is a highly dangerous toxic substance. Why are they are so desperate to add this unnatural man made form of toxic waste to our water, given the fact that it does not do what they claim it does and they are well aware of this?
Frank Plunkett, Sheffield Against Fluoridation
Date: 10 August 2009
REGARDING the latest information on fluoridated water, many readers will not have realised that what has been deliberately missed out of this latest release, is the fact that it is calcium fluoride naturally occurring in Trent water that is mixing with good old Yorkshire water, not deliberately added sodium fluoride or hydrofluorosilic acid, which are powerful toxic untested waste products. Yorkshire water is, of course, purer because it is not tainted with such naturally occurring high levels o
Then we have fluoridated milk: why is this not treated with pharmaceutical grade calcium fluoride? As it is the least harmful type of fluoride, are our children not worth it? Why are children being encouraged to drink it when, according to science, only a token application is required to cause an effect? There is no independent scientific evidence to prove it is safe or efficacious?
The only advantage fluoridated milk has over fluoridating our water is that there is an element of choice.
Sodium fluoride is a highly dangerous toxic substance. Why are they are so desperate to add this unnatural man made form of toxic waste to our water, given the fact that it does not do what they claim it does and they are well aware of this?
Frank Plunkett, Sheffield Against Fluoridation
posted by Bill at
9:53 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home