UK - Fluoridating water 'can prevent tooth decay in children'
Fluoridating water 'can prevent tooth decay in children'
By Kate Devlin, Medical Correspondent
Last Updated: 2:10PM GMT 01 Jan 2009
Adding Fluoride to water is the best way to prevent tooth decay in children and politicians should do more to overcome opposition to the measure, a leading medical journal has advised. Using fluoride daily is the most "cost effective" and "evidence based" way to prevent cavities and gum disease, but requires political will to implement, according to an editorial in the Lancet.
Campaigners claim that the chemical has been linked to illnesses including brittle bone disease and cancer.
But dentists believe that it could cuts rates of tooth decay, especially in deprived areas and among children.
Fluoride is currently added to about 10 per cent of Britain's water supply, mainly in the West Midlands and the North East of England.
Alan Johnson, the Health Secretary, has indicated that he is in favour of using increasing fluoride more widely.
"The daily use of fluoride is the most cost-effective, evidence-based approach to reduce dental decay," according to the Lancet.
It warns that tooth decay can negatively affect a child's development, including their ability to eat, sleep and concentrate in school.
Tooth pain is one of the most common reasons given for school absenteeism in countries like Britain, it adds.
Providing a daily dose could be achieved through fluoridating the water supply, but that this depends on "political will and community acceptance", it warns.
The editorial concludes: "Professionally, health workers, including physicians, nurses, paediatricians and pharmacists can all deliver prevention messages about the use of fluoride and the risk factors for oral disease. Politically, commitment is needed to integrate oral disease prevention into ... public-health systems. Good oral health should be everybody's business."
Promoting the use of fluoride toothpaste can also be effective, according to the journal.
A spokesman for the National Pure Water Association, which campaigns against the use of fluoride in tap water, said that the chemical was "dangerous".
"Fluoride in water doesn't work because it is in quantities too small to protect teeth yet large enough to be dangerous. Studies have shown it has been linked to cancer," he said.
"It is also a medication, and should be taken on an individual basis and not through the water supply."
Earlier this year Barry Cockcroft, the chief dental officer for England, suggested that almost half of Britain's water supply could be fluoridated, to improve dental health in deprived areas.
He told Dental Tribune magazine: "We only need to fluoridate 40 per cent of the country. Greater Manchester is currently considering it and there are many other areas that are looking at it."
Ministers are currently awaiting the results of a public consultation by South Central strategic health authority, which is considering adding fluoride to the drinking water in Southampton and south west Hampshire.
That review is not due to report until later this year but could act as a spur to other areas to consider fluoridation.
The Department of Health said that water companies will only begin fluoridation following consultations with local people.
A spokesperson added: "Dental decay is far worse in poorer communities than affluent ones.
"Fluoridation reduces these inequalities.
"Academic studies continue to show that fluoridation is safe and cost effective.
"Over 200 million people drink fluoridated water in America, some now for over 60 years, with no ill effects on their health."
By Kate Devlin, Medical Correspondent
Last Updated: 2:10PM GMT 01 Jan 2009
Adding Fluoride to water is the best way to prevent tooth decay in children and politicians should do more to overcome opposition to the measure, a leading medical journal has advised. Using fluoride daily is the most "cost effective" and "evidence based" way to prevent cavities and gum disease, but requires political will to implement, according to an editorial in the Lancet.
Campaigners claim that the chemical has been linked to illnesses including brittle bone disease and cancer.
But dentists believe that it could cuts rates of tooth decay, especially in deprived areas and among children.
Fluoride is currently added to about 10 per cent of Britain's water supply, mainly in the West Midlands and the North East of England.
Alan Johnson, the Health Secretary, has indicated that he is in favour of using increasing fluoride more widely.
"The daily use of fluoride is the most cost-effective, evidence-based approach to reduce dental decay," according to the Lancet.
It warns that tooth decay can negatively affect a child's development, including their ability to eat, sleep and concentrate in school.
Tooth pain is one of the most common reasons given for school absenteeism in countries like Britain, it adds.
Providing a daily dose could be achieved through fluoridating the water supply, but that this depends on "political will and community acceptance", it warns.
The editorial concludes: "Professionally, health workers, including physicians, nurses, paediatricians and pharmacists can all deliver prevention messages about the use of fluoride and the risk factors for oral disease. Politically, commitment is needed to integrate oral disease prevention into ... public-health systems. Good oral health should be everybody's business."
Promoting the use of fluoride toothpaste can also be effective, according to the journal.
A spokesman for the National Pure Water Association, which campaigns against the use of fluoride in tap water, said that the chemical was "dangerous".
"Fluoride in water doesn't work because it is in quantities too small to protect teeth yet large enough to be dangerous. Studies have shown it has been linked to cancer," he said.
"It is also a medication, and should be taken on an individual basis and not through the water supply."
Earlier this year Barry Cockcroft, the chief dental officer for England, suggested that almost half of Britain's water supply could be fluoridated, to improve dental health in deprived areas.
He told Dental Tribune magazine: "We only need to fluoridate 40 per cent of the country. Greater Manchester is currently considering it and there are many other areas that are looking at it."
Ministers are currently awaiting the results of a public consultation by South Central strategic health authority, which is considering adding fluoride to the drinking water in Southampton and south west Hampshire.
That review is not due to report until later this year but could act as a spur to other areas to consider fluoridation.
The Department of Health said that water companies will only begin fluoridation following consultations with local people.
A spokesperson added: "Dental decay is far worse in poorer communities than affluent ones.
"Fluoridation reduces these inequalities.
"Academic studies continue to show that fluoridation is safe and cost effective.
"Over 200 million people drink fluoridated water in America, some now for over 60 years, with no ill effects on their health."
2 Comments:
The following is the actual Lancet editorial - which downplays fluoridation and suggests fluoridated toothpaste is a better fluoride delivery system.
Oral health: prevention is key
Oral health is a neglected area of global health and has traditionally registered low on the radar of national policy makers. The reasons for this situation are complex
and varied. In many countries oral health is not included in national health surveys. And, if data are collected, it is usually in isolation from the context of general health.
Moreover, in some cultures, oral health is neglected because teeth are seen as expendable. Dentists have also taken little interest in advocacy to promote good oral
health, preferring to treat rather than prevent oral diseases.
And, because poor oral health aff ects morbidity more than mortality, governments have viewed oral conditions as less important than other, more life-threatening diseases.
Yet, globally, the burden of major oral diseases and conditions is high. Dental caries are one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide. 90% of people have
had dental problems or toothache caused by caries, and in low-to-middle income countries most caries remains untreated. Severe periodontitis affects 5–15% of most
populations. Oral cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and the most common in men in
southeast Asia. And 40–50% of people who are HIV positive have oral fungal, bacterial, or viral infections.
Access to oral care is a global problem, particularly in low-to-middle income countries. The workforce available to treat the most common oral health problems—dentists—are in short supply in these nations. Whereas countries such as Germany and the UK have one dentist per 1000 population, low-income and middle-income countries have one dentist per 50 000 people, and in some sub-Saharan African countries the ratio is one per 900 000 people. Dentists also cluster in cities where populations that can afford treatment usually live, leaving rural areas deprived of even the most basic emergency dental care.
But training more dentists and building dental
clinics—the western curative model of care—is costly
and unrealistic in most low-income and middle-income
countries. Prevention of oral disease is therefore key,
largely possible, and should be a routine part of other
health professionals’ work.
What can be done? The daily use of fl uoride is the most
cost-eff ective, evidence-based approach to reduce dental
decay. Water or salt fl uoridation are possible populationwide
approaches but their implementation depends on
the development and infrastructure of the country as well
as political will and community acceptance. Promoting the
daily use of eff ective fl uoride toothpaste is a more realistic
strategy but its cost prohibits its widespread use in many
low-income and middle-income countries. Governments
can remove taxes on fl uoride toothpaste, which in some
countries represent up to 50% of the product’s price,
and they can work with manufacturers to produce lower
cost toothpaste. In the Philippines, for example—where
97% of schoolchildren aged 6 years have dental caries—a
programme that combines the promotion of daily
handwashing with soap, tooth brushing with subsidised
fl uoride toothpaste, and twice-yearly deworming, is
proving eff ective, aff ordable, and sustainable at US$0·56
per child per year.
Policies that address the risk factors for oral diseases,
such as intake of sugars and tobacco use, can also be
implemented, especially because these moves will
help reduce chronic diseases. Oral diseases and chronic
diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, chronic
respiratory diseases, and diabetes share many common
risk factors. In 2007, a World Health Assembly resolution
called for oral health to be integrated into chronic
disease prevention programmes.
Promoting good oral health could also help countries
to achieve child-related development goals. Caries can
negatively aff ect a child’s ability to eat, sleep, and do
school work. Preliminary studies have suggested that
dental caries and related pain and sepsis might contribute
to undernutrition and low weight and height in children
in developing countries. In developed countries, studies
show that when dental caries are treated, children start
to put on weight and thrive. Oral pain is also one of the
most common reasons for school absenteeism.
Preventing oral disease is important and achievable.
Evidence-based, simple, and cost-eff ective preventive
approaches exist, but they need to be rigorously
promoted and implemented. Professionally, health
workers, including physicians, nurses, paediatricians, and
pharmacists can all deliver prevention messages about
the use of fl uoride and the risk factors for oral disease.
Politically, commitment is needed to integrate oral
disease prevention into programmes to prevent chronic
diseases and into public-health systems. Good oral
health should be everybody’s business. The Lancet
By FluorideNews, at 02 January, 2009
www.dianabuckland.webs.com said...
We in Queensland Australia are taking on our Government - they had damn well better stop poisoning We The People - we will no longer be their lab rats and their silicofluoride S6 toxic waste (sourced from industry) disposal units - see info on www.dianabuckland.webs.com
CALLING A GLOBAL REVOLUTION - AND TELL THESE CROOKS WHO ARE POISONING US THAT THE 'FLUORIDE' GAME IS UP!
RALLY AGAINST CHEMICAL WATER FLUORIDATION OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT HOUSE BRISBANE 9 AM - 11 AM 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009
Calling a Global Revolution against S6 poisons silicofluorides in our water supplies as "water fluoridation schemes". These are dangerous poisons and the Evidence of Extreme Harm has been suppressed http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/33574
POISON IN YOUR WATER SUPPLIES http://www.redox.com/msds/data/sosili.html
Say No to water fluoridation S6 poisons globally.
Paul Connett's FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK www.fluoridealert.org/
QUEENSLANDERS FOR SAFE WATER www.qawf.org
PEOPLE'S CLASS ACTION TRUST www.peoplesclassaction.org
*FLUORIDE *INFORMATION* AUSTRALIA* www.dianabuckland.webs.com
QUEENSLANDERS FOR SAFE WATER GOLD COAST www.thehealthvine.net
Say No to Recycled Sewerage & fluoride www.goldcoastwaterwatch.webs.com
Diana Buckland
MCS-GLOBAL WEBSITE: www.mcs-global.org
Awareness, Education, Information & Recognition of Chemical Injury,
Chemical Hypersensitivity, Chemical Sensitivity/MCS & other
chemically induced illnesses & diseases affecting civilians & military personnel
Global Chemical Pollution & the disastrous effects on human health & environmental health - CANCER AND THE CHEMICAL CONNECTION
Kallangur, Queensland, Australia
phone 61+7+32853573
Email: dbucklan@bigpond.net.au
Only after the last tree has been cut down
Only after the last river has been poisoned
Only after the last fish has been caught
ONLY then will you realise that money cannot be eaten
Cree Indian Prophecy
--
RALLY AGAINST CHEMICAL WATER FLUORIDATION OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT HOUSE BRISBANE 9 AM - 11 AM 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009
Calling a Global Revolution against S6 poisons silicofluorides in our water supplies as "water fluoridation schemes". These are dangerous poisons and the Evidence of Extreme Harm has been suppressed http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/33574
POISON IN YOUR WATER SUPPLIES http://www.redox.com/msds/data/sosili.html
Say No to water fluoridation S6 poisons globally.
Paul Connett's FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK www.fluoridealert.org/
QUEENSLANDERS FOR SAFE WATER www.qawf.org
PEOPLE'S CLASS ACTION TRUST www.peoplesclassaction.org
*FLUORIDE *INFORMATION* AUSTRALIA* www.dianabuckland.webs.com
QUEENSLANDERS FOR SAFE WATER GOLD COAST www.thehealthvine.net
Say No to Recycled Sewerage & fluoride www.goldcoastwaterwatch.webs.com
Diana Buckland
MCS-GLOBAL WEBSITE: www.mcs-global.org
Awareness, Education, Information & Recognition of Chemical Injury,
Chemical Hypersensitivity, Chemical Sensitivity/MCS & other
chemically induced illnesses & diseases affecting civilians & military personnel
Global Chemical Pollution & the disastrous effects on human health & environmental health - CANCER AND THE CHEMICAL CONNECTION
Kallangur, Queensland, Australia
phone 61+7+32853573
Email: dbucklan@bigpond.net.au
Only after the last tree has been cut down
Only after the last river has been poisoned
Only after the last fish has been caught
ONLY then will you realise that money cannot be eaten
Cree Indian Prophecy
By Anonymous, at 15 January, 2009
Post a Comment
<< Home