.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

UK Against Fluoridation

Friday, July 12, 2019

House of Lords

Photo of Lord TomlinsonLord Tomlinson Labour

My Lords, I declare an interest as a former chairman of the British FluoridationSociety. Does the Minister agree that prevention is much better than cure, and that you can prevent the need for dentists through a substantial increase in the use of fluoride in our water supplies? Is she satisfied with the progress being made on fluoridation of water? If not, what plans does she have to encourage it?

Photo of Baroness Blackwood of North OxfordBaroness Blackwood of North OxfordThe Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Health and Social Care

The noble Lord is quite right: prevention is always better than cure. That is why the programme for oral health improvement in both the NHS long-term plan and the dental contract being tested focuses on a more preventive approach to oral care. Water fluoridation is obviously a very effective way of improving oral health, particularly for children. According to the 2012 Act, it must be a local decision supported by Public Health England in the lead. We want to see more decisions. PHE’s guidance on delivering better oral health sets out clear expectations on this, but there are also other ways in which fluoride can get to children. One is through fluoride in toothpaste, which is now at effective concentrations; the other is that all dentists are expected to deliver fluoride to teeth directly, at clinically appropriate intervals, to all children in their care.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home