WHAT THEY DO NOT TELL YOU ABOUT FLOURIDE AND VACCINES

FLOURIDE

Flouride concerns me, Why we add it to our water supply, when Europe, with the exception of Nazi Germany, does not? Why Mexico and the United States decided to do so after the war when evidence that large concentrations can yield lower IQ scores, and keep people docile?

Yes, it is true that in the re-mineralization of the enamel in your teeth that fluoride makes a much stronger and more acid resistant Amalgam than the natural one it replaces. Furthermore, I know this to be a discovery from the early part of the 20th century from a town with a well in which Fluoride was present in concentration and that those people had considerably less tooth decay than everybody else. I also know that if research has been done on the 3800 known minerals into what might also yield a high-value tooth enamel hardening amalgam other than TOXIC FLUORIDE, this information is not easily found on the internet, and therefore I am suspicious if any research was done at all.

Which brings me to a conversation I had with a Dentist when I took my 3-year-old in for her second visit. When asked why Flouride, his response was that it was a critical ingredient in human Tooth enamel (not true, but technically once fluoride mineralization in tooth enamel has occurred it is.) He claimed that thorough tests were done and this was the Ideal outcome. (again not true, and in this case, ASS TALK.)

So the takeaway, Fluoride will make you docile and stupid, three countries, the US, Mexico and Nazi Germany have added it to their water supply. It is toxic, and it does remineralize human tooth enamel to an amalgam that is stronger and more acid resistant than the natural mineral state of human teeth. Are there better less toxic minerals that could be used? Most surely there are, but they have never been tested, the whole of the Dental community has this attitude of “We know best, your questions are stupid, and it isn’t broken so why fix it.”

Now you know what I know, and when you get talked down to by the world of ‘know betters’ you will have the data they cannot refute and the key challenge, where are the studies on other minerals for human teeth? Why were they not done, and when do you plan on starting that research. oh and by the way I have a High concentrate of Mercury and Flouride water here for you to drink before we (the angry mob) will tolerate you smart ass from leaving the building. Bottoms up! Why do I add the Mercury? Simple we have known now for over 90 years that there is no safe level of Mercury for humans, None! And yet, the professional dental community, to this day does push back on the continued argument that silver-mercury amalgam fillings were and still are safe. It took forever for them to develop any non-mercury alternative. It exists now, and they have at least become somewhat passive and accommodating with those of us who do not want these ‘Mercury Fillings’ in our mouths. But they will charge you more for the non-toxic composite fillings none-the-less. And last I checked you still cannot successfully sue your Dentist for the potential harm of those old Mercury fillings.

So anyways a little science, a lot of skepticism and hopefully we can act with a little more information into what and how much of the BS we need to tolerate. As a society, challenging the nice pat answers of a couple of generations ago should be considered wise and normal. When we do, our paid by our tax dollar experts should listen, treat our concerns with the highest gravity and respond with respect and action, scientific action. They can respect our challenges and do the research or they can STFU.