F.A.N. Newsletter
Here is some really exciting
news.
Because of the wonderful generosity of supporters like you we are very close to reaching our goal of $75,000 a month ahead of schedule. Right now we have reached $71,145 from 433 donors, which means that we will reach our goals with just 67 more donors of any amount.
You - and your family members and friends
- still have time to be part of our winning team and support FAN's most exciting
effort ever*.
How to donate
On behalf of the FAN team, thank you.
Paul and Ellen Connett
Because of the wonderful generosity of supporters like you we are very close to reaching our goal of $75,000 a month ahead of schedule. Right now we have reached $71,145 from 433 donors, which means that we will reach our goals with just 67 more donors of any amount.
This $75,000 will then be tripled to
$225,000!
How to donate
- Online at our
secure server.
- Or by Check, payable to
the Fluoride Action Network. Send your check to:
Fluoride Action Network
c/o Connett
104 Walnut Street
Binghamton NY 13905
On behalf of the FAN team, thank you.
* The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
authorizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to prohibit the
“particular use” of a chemical that presents an unreasonable risk to the general
public or susceptible subpopulations. TSCA gives EPA the authority to prohibit
drinking water additives.
The Fluoride Action Network together with Food
& Water Watch, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, International
Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology, Moms Against Fluoridation and others
petitioned EPA to exercise its authority to prohibit the purposeful addition of
fluoridation chemicals to U.S. water supplies. We made this request on the
grounds that a large body of animal, cellular, and human research shows that
fluoride is neurotoxic at doses within the range now seen in fluoridated
communities.
We have won the first two rounds in Federal
Court. The
first was the Dec 21, 2017, ruling to
allow the case to go forward, thus ending EPA’s effort to dismiss the case. The
second
ruling on Feb 7, 2018, allows us to enter new studies into consideration,
something that EPA argued against.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home