F.A.N.Newsletter
Yesterday afternoon, we received this
exciting message from FAN’s Legal Advisor, Michael Connett,
JD:
We plan to release a video interview with attorney Michael Connett about the lawsuit and yesterday's decision. The interview was filmed last night in San Francisco. This interview, along with our growing fundraising total will be published on the revolving banners on our homepage: www.fluoridealert.org We will also provide a full analysis from Michael early next week; likely on Tuesday.
Yesterday's exciting news has unleashed a
number of new challenges - we will receive $2000 when we reach 400 donors. We
will receive a further $2000 when we reach $80,000 and $5000 when we reach
$95,000. We are really on our way to VICTORY in 2018.
Our 300th donor (who won a copy of The Zero Waste Solution...) was James Swisher from Williamsport, PA. In a phone interview last night he told me he got involved when his granddaughter developed dental fluorosis about 11 years ago. He used our website to find out more and has read The Case Against Fluoride. He has been a regular supporter ever since. Thank you James. Our 400th donor will also win a signed copy of one of my (our) books.
“Judge just handed down his ruling -- he
has denied EPA's motion to dismiss!”
A federal judge has ruled
in our favor, to allow our lawsuit against the EPA to continue to move
forward. This ruling was picked
up by a prominent law website, which in turn has been picked
up by Reuters. So the news is out: WE ARE WINNING. The next phase will be
discovery.We plan to release a video interview with attorney Michael Connett about the lawsuit and yesterday's decision. The interview was filmed last night in San Francisco. This interview, along with our growing fundraising total will be published on the revolving banners on our homepage: www.fluoridealert.org We will also provide a full analysis from Michael early next week; likely on Tuesday.
Fundraising
Update
We have reached $73,383 from 303 donors
as of 8 am today - en route to our mini goal of $100,000 by midnight Christmas
Eve.Our 300th donor (who won a copy of The Zero Waste Solution...) was James Swisher from Williamsport, PA. In a phone interview last night he told me he got involved when his granddaughter developed dental fluorosis about 11 years ago. He used our website to find out more and has read The Case Against Fluoride. He has been a regular supporter ever since. Thank you James. Our 400th donor will also win a signed copy of one of my (our) books.
How to Donate:
You can make a donation at our secure online server, or by check, payable to
Fluoride Action Network, and mail to:
FAN
c/o Connett
104 Walnut Street
Binghamton, New York 13905
Timeline of Lawsuit Against the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA):
Below is a complete timeline of events
leading up to yesterdays big win. If you have difficulty viewing the table
below, click
here to view it on our website.
November 23, 2016
|
Fluoride Action Network (FAN), together
with a coalition of environmental, medical and health groups, collectively known
as the “Petitioners” see * below, served the EPA with a Petition calling on the Agency to ban the
addition of fluoridation chemicals to public water supplies due to the risks
these chemicals pose to the brain. The Petition was submitted under Section 21
of the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) because it authorizes EPA to prohibit the “particular use” of a
chemical that presents an unreasonable risk to the general public or susceptible
subpopulations. TSCA also gives EPA the authority to prohibit drinking water
additives.
|
February 27, 2017
|
EPA denied the TSCA Section 21 Petition.
Read
their reasons here. In their decision the EPA claimed, “The
petition has not set forth a scientifically defensible basis to conclude that
any persons have suffered neurotoxic harm as a result of exposure to fluoride in
the U.S. through the purposeful addition of fluoridation chemicals to drinking
water or otherwise from fluoride exposure in the
U.S.”
|
April 18, 2017
|
|
September 25, 2017
|
|
October 25, 2017
|
|
October 25, 2017
|
Amicus
Curiae Brief of the Natural Resources Defense Council
and Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families in Support of Neither Party. Their brief
against EPA’s basis to dismiss our section 21 Petition that FAN et al. “must
evaluate all of a chemical’s conditions of use”
|
November 30, 2017
|
Hearing with arguments from both parties.
Michael Connett, JD, put forward the arguments of why EPA’s Motion to Dismiss
should be denied.
|
December 21, 2017
|
|
*
The Petitioners:
Fluoride Action Network, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, Food & Water Watch, International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, Moms Against Fluoridation, Organic Consumers Association, and various individuals. |
See all FAN bulletins online
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home