.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

UK Against Fluoridation

Wednesday, March 01, 2017

FORCED-FLUORIDATION


I’m a believer
I sincerely believe that the best thing I can do for my teeth is drink copious amounts of artificially fluoridated water and other drinks with high fluoride concentrations, cook food with fluoridated water in Teflon-coated pots and pans, wash my clothes in fluoridated water, take showers with fluoridated water, eat processed foods made with fluoridated water and sprayed with fluoride-based pesticides, irrigated with fluoridated water, and fertilised with superphosphate containing residual fluoride, have my home fumigated with sulfuryl fluoride, use extra strength fluoridated toothpaste, fluoridated mouthwash, and fluoridated dental floss, have my teeth treated with fluoride varnish and fluoride gel, take fluoride tablets or fluoride drops or fluoridated salt or fluoridated milk or suck fluoridated lozenges or chew fluoridated gum each and every day I do not believe I am getting enough fluoride, and if I am unlucky enough to need any fillings despite my fluoride devotion, all dental materials (i.e. any bonding agents, liners, glass ionomers, giomers, composites, sealants, or cements) used will have added fluoride. If I am lucky enough to be given another fluorinated anaesthetic or other fluorinated drug which releases free fluoride ions in my body, well that will just be an extra special bonus. The best thing of all is that fluoride is cumulative, so a large proportion of the fluoride I consume will never leave me; my devotion is reciprocated. If anyone knows of any other artificially fluoridated products please let me know, because I wouldn’t want to miss out. I truly believe the reason there are so many fluoride products, at very reasonable prices, is the enormous love fluoridationist dentists, public health officials, politicians, and phosphate fertiliser companies have for strangers’ teeth. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that phosphate fertiliser companies can’t get rid of enough of the shit, or that it is a major industrial pollutant which many industries are happy to sweep under the rug, or that it is a convenient distraction from the real cause of dental cavities (i.e. sugar), or that dumping it into public water supplies enables the pretence of doing something to help poor children while actually harming them.

The forced-fluoridation experiment
Seriously, though, the forced-fluoridation human experiment is the dumping of highly toxic industrial fluoride pollution into public water supplies, under the pretext of reducing dental caries, especially in children, and most of all in disadvantaged children. It started in Grand Rapids, Michigan on January 25, 1945, and to this day more people are directly subjected to it in the US than in the rest of the world combined. The fluoridation chemicals used are hexafluorosilicic acid (H2SiF6), sodium fluorosilicate (Na2SiF6), and sodium fluoride (NaF), waste products from the phosphate rock and aluminium ore mining industries.

Forced-fluoridation is medical malpractice on an industrial scale. Fluoridation chemicals are the only medications which are delivered via public water supplies. Medicating public water supplies with any chemical violates the human rights and medical ethics principle of informed consent to medical intervention, is entirely indiscriminate, results in the random dosing of residents since exposure to the chemical is uncontrolled, and is environmentally irresponsible because the vast majority of tap water is not ingested, so the environmental load is vastly greater than it would be if the drug were delivered by conventional means. Medicating public water supplies means that politicians are subjecting everyone to treatment which no doctor can legally impose on anyone, and is surely the most SPAM-fisted method of drug delivery ever devised.

Medicating public water supplies with fluoridation chemicals is especially egregious, because fluoride is a cumulative poison with an estimated half life in the body of 20 years, there was no good quality scientific research which indicated that forced-fluoridation was anything but harmful and useless in the 1940s and there still isn’t any, the best quality scientific research which has been conducted indicates that forced-fluoridation is in fact both harmful and useless, the fluoride pollution which is used is industrial grade rather than pharmaceutical grade, and fluoride is not biodegradable. The forced-fluoridation experiment is inhumane, authoritarian, violent, criminal, irrational, backward, pseudoscientific, a scam, and all risk, no reward for those subjected to it.

Some quick reading for starters
I have asked many forced-fluoridation fanatics to tell me how much accumulated fluoride in the body they think is safe. So far not a single one of them has been able to answer the question. There are significant sources of fluoride exposure in addition to those listed above, by the way........

That's a good question for Ken and Steve. Ignore the forced-fluoridation fanatics description we get called worse.

Article linked by title to Dan Germouse

https://forcedfluoridationfreedomfighters.com/


4 Comments:

  • That's from the homepage of my website, in case anyone is wondering. It also includes a bunch of references which haven't been listed here.

    By Anonymous Dan Germouse, at 01 March, 2017  

  • Hi Dan
    I did link the title to your page and the ending of ............. indicates that there is more on the original page.

    I wonder if Ken or Steve will leave a comment to your question?

    By Blogger Bill, at 01 March, 2017  

  • Hi Bill, yeah I know, it wasn't a complaint I just thought I'd mention those things. If you mean the Parrott (Ken Perrott) and the slott machine (Steven Slott), I know them well (unfortunately) and neither of them have a clue, or if they do they are playing very dumb. The slott machine has actually "answered" the question many times, but its so-called answer is just a statement that the tolerable upper intake level of 10 mg per day is safe, without evidence. Apparently it doesn't understand the difference between the amount of accumulated fluoride in the body and the daily fluoride intake. Apart from that, I have read the document upon which the 10 mg per day figure is based, and it is absolutely farcical.

    By Anonymous Dan Germouse, at 02 March, 2017  

  • Yes that's the two gentlemen.

    By Blogger Bill, at 02 March, 2017  

Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home