Fluoride Alert newsletter
Columbia, Tennessee – On September
25th the Columbia Power and Water Systems Board of Public Utilities
voted 3-2 to discontinue
fluoridation of the
drinking water for the city’s approximately 35,000 residents. The vote came
after months of deliberation and review of over 200 pages of documents, studies,
and reports submitted by the public. According to one water board member who
also sits on the city council, “his research of fluoridation showed the chemical
is hazardous for consumers who ingest it, as well as being dangerous for
employees who handle it.”
Tecumseth, Ontario – On September
30th, councilors in New Tecumseth voted 7-3 to end 40 years of
fluoridation for the
town of Tottenham’s 5,000 residents. Prior to this vote, councilors approved a
plebiscite during the October 2014 election, which will ask voters in Alliston,
Beeton, and Tottenham if they want fluoridation. In the meantime, the fluoride
will be flushed from the water supply.
Davis City, California – On
October 1st, the Davis city council soundly rejected fluoridation by a vote
of 4-1. The proposal
would have cost $2 million to implement, plus an additional $300,000 annually in
chemical costs for the city with 66,000 residents. Councilors stated that
opposition to fluoridation was ten times greater then support for the practice
amongst the public.
New Zealand -- The New Zealand
Advertising Standards Authority recently ruled that a pro-fluoridation
advertisement from a local dentist made exaggerated claims about
fluoridation that could
not be proved and therefore must be removed. Harley Dentistry claimed in their
ad, "water fluoridation reduces decay by 20 per cent in our most vulnerable
people, our children and those on lower incomes." Harley Dentistry was unable to
provide evidence proving the claim, putting them in violation of New Zealand’s
advertising code of ethics. You can read the full Advertising Standards Authority decision
here.
The Bad News:
Unfortunately, this week there were two
significant loses for the fluoride-free community. The first occurred on October
8th, when city councilors in Brooksville, Florida voted 4-1 to return fluoride to the drinking
water, two years after they had voted to end the practice. This week’s vote was
not the result of a science-based campaign, but the result of a misleading
pro-fluoride intimidation campaign led by the Florida Department of Health, a
handful of regional dentists, and the Tampa Bay Times. The councilors and Mayor
who opposed fluoridation were regularly attacked and ridiculed by the Tampa Bay
Times, their affiliated newspapers, and Palm Harbor dentist Johnny Johnson. When
the council invited Paul Connett to debate Johnny Johnson, not only did Johnson
withdrawal from the debate, but Dr. Connett was unfairly criticized and attacked
by the local media for his presentation, and was repeatedly denied an
opportunity to have a response published. In the end, the council's decision
was less about science and more about keeping the Tampa Bay Times from bullying
them from office. (There will be more coverage of the Brooksville story in
an upcoming bulletin)The second setback was in the Whakatane Region of New Zealand, where a majority of citizens in three communities voted in favor of fluoridation in a non-binding referendum. Earlier this year, Hamilton Councilors held a tribunal to study fluoridation. After hearing expert testimony on both sides of the issue, and reviewing hundreds of pages of research on fluoride, the tribunal voted 7-1 to oppose fluoridation. In response, the pro-fluoride lobby--including the taxpayer funded district health board--gathered enough petition signatures to force a referendum on the issue. They then spent tens of thousands of dollars on a propaganda campaign that included banners, billboards, and ads in all media formats, which also helped them secure the support of most of the local editiroal boards and newspaper staff. This resulted in a very one-sided and unscientific "debate" of fluoridation prior to the low turnout vote.
The referendum vote is non-binding, so
the fight is far from over in Whakatane. We will be providing in-depth coverage
of the Whakatane campaign in an upcoming bulletin.
More than
9,700 people have signed this petition to Stop Water Fluoridation, and the number continues to rise. Which
one of you will be number 10,000? Please sign and share this important
petition.
“The practice of water fluoridation should end immediately. All of the available evidence suggests that not only will this lead to a marked reduction in fluorosis but that there would not be a significant rise in dental caries.”
This was the recommendation to the Joint committee on Health and Children in the Irish parliament in 2007 when the committee was holding special hearings on water fluoridation. The 90-page report authored by the former Irish Minister for the Environment, John Gormley, contained analysis of all available research on fluoride at the time, and based it’s final recommendations on expert testimony presented during the hearings.
The report states: “The Department of Health's assessment of
the overwhelming benefits of water fluoridation is not justified…we believe on
the basis of the international studies there would be no long-term increase in
dental decay if fluoride were not added to Irish drinking water…we note that
dental health has improved to the same degree in countries where there is no
water fluoridation. While positive aspects of fluoridation have been
over-stated, the growing negative impact has not been properly recognized…the
Committee is disappointed and alarmed that no general health studies have ever
been carried out, particularly considering that four in ten 15 year olds are now
affected by fluorosis.”
However, instead of acting on the report
and ending fluoridation, the committee rejected the report and suppressed it’s
contents for six years until a copy was made public only weeks ago. Clearly,
this is one of the most egregious examples of the truth about fluoridation being
hidden by a powerful minority that supports the practice. It is obvious that the
pro-fluoride lobby is more interested in protecting fluoridation policy and
their reputations then they are in protecting the public’s
health.-Read the full report
-Read the groundbreaking interview with the Report’s Author, John Gormley
Paul Connett Town Hall
Teleconference
FAN’s Director and co-author of
“The Case Against Fluoride”, Paul Connett, PhD will be featured in
a town hall style event on this month’s International Fluoride Free
Teleconference. The call will start with a brief presentation on fluoridation by
Dr. Connett, followed by an extensive question and answer period where callers
can ask their fluoride questions. The teleconference will take place this
Sunday, October 13 at 5:00pm ET / 2:00pm PT, and will last up to two
hours to give as many people as possible the opportunity to ask Dr. Connett a
question. Don’t miss this unprecedented event; get your questions
answered. To participate in the free teleconference, you must REGISTER TODAY!
- What: Paul Connett Town Hall Teleconference & Online Presentation
- When: Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:00pm PT / 5:00pm ET – 2 hours
- RSVP: Required--REGISTER TODAY
Sincerely,
Stuart Cooper
FAN, Campaign
Manager
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home