Uk - Daily Echo - Abolish these outrageous fluoride laws
In my view
By Jenny Godshall
of Upper Clatford
Abolish these outrageous fluoride laws
FLUORIDE pushers like Tim Retout replace overwhelming peer reviewed evidence against fluoridation, with crude propaganda. But the science is stacked too heavily against them.
In a written answer to Parliament, Baroness Hayman stated: "We (the Government) accept that dental f luorosis is a manifestation of systemic toxicity." - Hansard, 20 Apr 1999: WA 158.
The severity of fluorosis and related diseases, depends on one's physical constitution.
It spans the entire spectrum from mild to potentially fatal. Much like smoking. This is a risk Mr Retoirt is prepared to take.
However, he has no right to force that risk on everyone else. Using children to front a scheme that has no health, social, ethical or financial benefits, is despicable, These people wilfully ignore the findings of the York Review, recognised as being the most balanced and scientifically honest
assessment of fluoridation. Its conclusions were a bombshell. Fluoridation was not proved safe. Its contentious
benefits had to be weighed against potentially very serious harms.
The claim of equalising dental health between rich and poor also failed. The policy was skwmed - a staggering blow to the fluoride lobby. There was an immediate cover-up. But in art unprecedented move, the review's chairman, Professor Sheldon, publicly denounced the shocking propaganda that followed.
The peddlers of fluoridation must be judged against this background. A scheme this preposterous defies logic until we realise that dental health is just a cover story. Hexafluorosilicic Acid (used in fluoridation) is industrial toxic waste, banned from sea, rivers and landfill sites. However, by political connivance, it can be dumped in public water supplies, despite being contaminated with up to two per cent of heavy metals and carcinogens.
Fluoride pushers demand the unconstitutional and despotic takeover of the public water supply as a conduit for enforced mass medication with this toxin. It's shameful that they would rather spend millions on this travesty than put the money where it's most needed - on more NHS dentists, frontline services and life-saving drugs,
The corrupt fluoride laws must be abolished.
By Jenny Godshall
of Upper Clatford
Abolish these outrageous fluoride laws
FLUORIDE pushers like Tim Retout replace overwhelming peer reviewed evidence against fluoridation, with crude propaganda. But the science is stacked too heavily against them.
In a written answer to Parliament, Baroness Hayman stated: "We (the Government) accept that dental f luorosis is a manifestation of systemic toxicity." - Hansard, 20 Apr 1999: WA 158.
The severity of fluorosis and related diseases, depends on one's physical constitution.
It spans the entire spectrum from mild to potentially fatal. Much like smoking. This is a risk Mr Retoirt is prepared to take.
However, he has no right to force that risk on everyone else. Using children to front a scheme that has no health, social, ethical or financial benefits, is despicable, These people wilfully ignore the findings of the York Review, recognised as being the most balanced and scientifically honest
assessment of fluoridation. Its conclusions were a bombshell. Fluoridation was not proved safe. Its contentious
benefits had to be weighed against potentially very serious harms.
The claim of equalising dental health between rich and poor also failed. The policy was skwmed - a staggering blow to the fluoride lobby. There was an immediate cover-up. But in art unprecedented move, the review's chairman, Professor Sheldon, publicly denounced the shocking propaganda that followed.
The peddlers of fluoridation must be judged against this background. A scheme this preposterous defies logic until we realise that dental health is just a cover story. Hexafluorosilicic Acid (used in fluoridation) is industrial toxic waste, banned from sea, rivers and landfill sites. However, by political connivance, it can be dumped in public water supplies, despite being contaminated with up to two per cent of heavy metals and carcinogens.
Fluoride pushers demand the unconstitutional and despotic takeover of the public water supply as a conduit for enforced mass medication with this toxin. It's shameful that they would rather spend millions on this travesty than put the money where it's most needed - on more NHS dentists, frontline services and life-saving drugs,
The corrupt fluoride laws must be abolished.
posted by Bill at
10:10 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home