UK - Daily Echo - Impact that has not been assessed
Impact that has not been assessed
By Anna Peckham
THE Copenhagen summit on climate change is attracting much attention with politicians falling over themselves to show off their green credentials. What has this to do with the local fluoride controversy? Well, quite a lot actually. There is a green angle to this debate that has been mostly overlooked by those keen to add this chemical to the region's drinking water.
Hexafluorosilicic acid is a byproduct of the phosphate fertiliser industry and as such, is not allowed to be disposed of in the sea or river waters. However, when designated for use as a medicinal product, it can be added to drinking water, despite not being eligible for a medicinal licence. Shockingly, the SNA did not carry out an assessment of the environmental impact of fluoridation. This is despite the Southampton area's unique environmental position with the Solent and surrounding waters described as some of the most scientifically interesting waters in the country. The Marine and Coastal Access Act which has just come into force is concerned with the well-being of the sea bed and protection of the natural environment". So why has there been no independent environmental assessment of the impact of fluoridation on this unique marine environment?
Recently concern has been raised about the impact of fluoride on the local oyster population as there is evidence that fluoride accumulates in these shellfish and may impact negatively on the Solent Oyster Fishery.
If fluoridation goes ahead, there are many who will simply refuse to drink tap water and opt for bottled water instead. This is bad news for the environment, resulting in more plastic waste and an increase in the carbon load involved in the manufacture and transport of bottled water. The only other option is to remove fluoride from tap water by installing an expensive reverse osmosis filter but these systems use a substantial amount more water and energy to operate. Whichever way you look at it water fluoridation WILL have a detrimental effect on the environment.
If politicians and policy makers are genuinely concerned for the environment, the wider impact of decisions such as water fluoridation need to be properly evaluated. Unfortunately, it seems this has not been the case and the long term consequences for the environment of this policy remain unknown.
By Anna Peckham
THE Copenhagen summit on climate change is attracting much attention with politicians falling over themselves to show off their green credentials. What has this to do with the local fluoride controversy? Well, quite a lot actually. There is a green angle to this debate that has been mostly overlooked by those keen to add this chemical to the region's drinking water.
Hexafluorosilicic acid is a byproduct of the phosphate fertiliser industry and as such, is not allowed to be disposed of in the sea or river waters. However, when designated for use as a medicinal product, it can be added to drinking water, despite not being eligible for a medicinal licence. Shockingly, the SNA did not carry out an assessment of the environmental impact of fluoridation. This is despite the Southampton area's unique environmental position with the Solent and surrounding waters described as some of the most scientifically interesting waters in the country. The Marine and Coastal Access Act which has just come into force is concerned with the well-being of the sea bed and protection of the natural environment". So why has there been no independent environmental assessment of the impact of fluoridation on this unique marine environment?
Recently concern has been raised about the impact of fluoride on the local oyster population as there is evidence that fluoride accumulates in these shellfish and may impact negatively on the Solent Oyster Fishery.
If fluoridation goes ahead, there are many who will simply refuse to drink tap water and opt for bottled water instead. This is bad news for the environment, resulting in more plastic waste and an increase in the carbon load involved in the manufacture and transport of bottled water. The only other option is to remove fluoride from tap water by installing an expensive reverse osmosis filter but these systems use a substantial amount more water and energy to operate. Whichever way you look at it water fluoridation WILL have a detrimental effect on the environment.
If politicians and policy makers are genuinely concerned for the environment, the wider impact of decisions such as water fluoridation need to be properly evaluated. Unfortunately, it seems this has not been the case and the long term consequences for the environment of this policy remain unknown.
posted by Bill at
9:26 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home