Australia - A recent writer is a friend of mine who has been writing letters in support of fluoridation for years.
To The Editor: A recent writer is a friend of mine who has been writing letters in support of fluoridation for years.
He is intelligent, so I gathered together peer-reviewed, scientific journal articles showing fluoride's dangers and personally handed them to him.
He refused, continues quoting government and quasi-government agencies that fluoridation is completely safe and effective.
If we've learned nothing else from the last seven years, we should know official agencies sometimes stretch the truth, even lie.
The writer refers to us who oppose fluoridation as "fear-mongering quacks" who triumph "over the truth." I have a letter written by Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice John P. Flaherty. He presided over an injunction against the fluoridation of Allegheny County, Penn., consisting of "twenty-eight hundred pages of testimony" in which he ruled that "the evidence is quite convincing that the addition of sodium fluoride to the public water supply at one part per million is extremely deleterious to the human body." He goes on to say: "I received quite an education, and noted that the proponents of fluoridation (like the writer?) do nothing more than try to impune (sic) the objectivity of those who oppose fluoridation."
Others and I feel impugned!
Jan Pettit
Saluda
He is intelligent, so I gathered together peer-reviewed, scientific journal articles showing fluoride's dangers and personally handed them to him.
He refused, continues quoting government and quasi-government agencies that fluoridation is completely safe and effective.
If we've learned nothing else from the last seven years, we should know official agencies sometimes stretch the truth, even lie.
The writer refers to us who oppose fluoridation as "fear-mongering quacks" who triumph "over the truth." I have a letter written by Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice John P. Flaherty. He presided over an injunction against the fluoridation of Allegheny County, Penn., consisting of "twenty-eight hundred pages of testimony" in which he ruled that "the evidence is quite convincing that the addition of sodium fluoride to the public water supply at one part per million is extremely deleterious to the human body." He goes on to say: "I received quite an education, and noted that the proponents of fluoridation (like the writer?) do nothing more than try to impune (sic) the objectivity of those who oppose fluoridation."
Others and I feel impugned!
Jan Pettit
Saluda
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home