Dorset & New Forest Safe Water Society Chairman's letter
Dear Friends.
We must continue our vigilance to protect our precious drinking water supplies. The situation may be better than 10+ years ago. Many of the levels of contaminants such as pesticides, nitrates have been reduced in quantityby the water companies. We must still be aware of the many doctors and dentists who seem to be totally unaware of serious environmental concerns and are still promoting water fluoridation !I have just been reading the latest issue of "Fluoride Journal-vol 39 no According to the editorial written by Professor Albert Burgstahler of Kansas, USA - The National Research Council (NRC) of U.S. Academy of Sciences published a 367 page "Review of fluorides in drinking water" in March 2006. There were over 1,000 references. They included a large amount of well documented evidence of the adverse health effects of fluorides in drinking water at or close to levels of 1 ppm or lower concentrations. Among these findings are the increase of dental fluorosis, depressed thyroid function, gastrointestinal problems, and detrimental neurological effects. Despite thef act that The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requested the preparation of this document-they have not yet quoted from it or referred to it! It took three years in the making and as I said was actually published last March. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not referred to it either. Do the NRC-EPA -FDA talk to each other ! Well, I am sure that you regularly follow our blogger(ukagainstfluoride.blogspot.com/ ) As you can see, people just will not listen or take in anything that they read...and they dictate our NHS ! The pro-fluoride spiels go on despite massive amount of evidence against it .
By the way there is to be an International Conference on Fluorides inBejing,China on 9-12 October 2007. If interested see www.fluorideresearch.com
My Best Wishes to all.
Dr Anthony Fox,Chairman
We must continue our vigilance to protect our precious drinking water supplies. The situation may be better than 10+ years ago. Many of the levels of contaminants such as pesticides, nitrates have been reduced in quantityby the water companies. We must still be aware of the many doctors and dentists who seem to be totally unaware of serious environmental concerns and are still promoting water fluoridation !I have just been reading the latest issue of "Fluoride Journal-vol 39 no According to the editorial written by Professor Albert Burgstahler of Kansas, USA - The National Research Council (NRC) of U.S. Academy of Sciences published a 367 page "Review of fluorides in drinking water" in March 2006. There were over 1,000 references. They included a large amount of well documented evidence of the adverse health effects of fluorides in drinking water at or close to levels of 1 ppm or lower concentrations. Among these findings are the increase of dental fluorosis, depressed thyroid function, gastrointestinal problems, and detrimental neurological effects. Despite thef act that The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requested the preparation of this document-they have not yet quoted from it or referred to it! It took three years in the making and as I said was actually published last March. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not referred to it either. Do the NRC-EPA -FDA talk to each other ! Well, I am sure that you regularly follow our blogger(ukagainstfluoride.blogspot.com/ ) As you can see, people just will not listen or take in anything that they read...and they dictate our NHS ! The pro-fluoride spiels go on despite massive amount of evidence against it .
By the way there is to be an International Conference on Fluorides inBejing,China on 9-12 October 2007. If interested see www.fluorideresearch.com
My Best Wishes to all.
Dr Anthony Fox,Chairman
posted by Bill at
5:48 PM
2 Comments:
What action should we take? Resident from Bournemouth.
By
Anonymous, at 28 November, 2013
Bournemouth is safe for the present from fluoridation, all hinges on what happens in Southampton and we've been waiting since April for the Public Health England to admit that they have no right to continue with any plans that the SHA had for fluoridation.
Keep reading this blog and others in order to prevent future moves to introduce it.
By
Bill, at 29 November, 2013
Post a Comment
<< Home