.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

UK Against Fluoridation

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Australia - good letter

WHEN dentists use language such as R. McCray, president of the Australian Dental Association, Queensland, (The Border Mail, February 22), it is a sure sign he and his association have lost the plot.
Spin-doctors have failed in their hopeful cover-up of the serious toxicology relating to problems which are associated with fluoridation and its utter failure to stop tooth decay (see Sydney Report 2005).
Does the ADA president, in his own words, consider at least 15 Nobel Prize scientists in their published opposition to fluoridation are, “malicious, ignorant scare-mongering” scientists?
The president seems completely out of scientific focus by claiming “fluoridation support from every leading medical and scientific authority from the World Health Organisation down”, none of whom can show scientific proof of fluoridation safety including WHO and the Australian Dental Association.
That statement by the ADA is so wrong in light of the fact that all the scientifically advanced countries in Europe have either stopped fluoridation or never used it.
Consider this: If all the fluoridation hype by dentists was true, then most dentists would be out of work because fluoridated populations, including Australia which is 85 per cent fluoridated, would be displaying perfect undecayed teeth.
This is not the fact — indeed the governments of Australia and the ADA cry out for more dentists to treat people waiting five years for dental help in fluoridated cities.
As 96 per cent of the world population do not use fluoridation, it proves the magic bullet of fluoride is a failed, meaningless health proposition foisted by compulsion on the people without their consent.
— AUGUST SIRKEL

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home