End summary of the posted 3 pages from Doug Cross
Conclusion.
Clearly, there is a serious incompatibility between UK and EC legislative frameworks here. Authorization of medication with unlicensed fluoridated water by national Governments is incompatible with the European Directives. It is also a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The situation is identical in both the UK and Ireland. The decisions of the IMB'and MHRA may be subject to challenge through the Courts as an issue of public interest. In the event that the Courts find that fluoridated water is a medicinal product according to the definitions of the EC Directive and the judgements of the ECJ, then potential further actions may be eligible under criminal law, and private actions for damages under the civil codes.
Doug Cross, Forensic Ecologist, November 2005.
http://www.fieldforensics.co.uk/cvs.htm
Clearly, there is a serious incompatibility between UK and EC legislative frameworks here. Authorization of medication with unlicensed fluoridated water by national Governments is incompatible with the European Directives. It is also a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The situation is identical in both the UK and Ireland. The decisions of the IMB'and MHRA may be subject to challenge through the Courts as an issue of public interest. In the event that the Courts find that fluoridated water is a medicinal product according to the definitions of the EC Directive and the judgements of the ECJ, then potential further actions may be eligible under criminal law, and private actions for damages under the civil codes.
Doug Cross, Forensic Ecologist, November 2005.
http://www.fieldforensics.co.uk/cvs.htm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home