.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

UK Against Fluoridation

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Australia - Border Mail Letter.

Tue, Jan 03, 2006
Fluoride would fail drug tests
KIM Radnell claims that fluoridation is safe but gives no evidence at all (The Border Mail, December 15). Kim does not believe that people can be sensitive or allergic to the toxicity of fluoride. Kim should talk to local sufferers.
There are many in Melbourne who are medically proven as fluoride-sensitive and have to spend massive amounts of money on filtering out all the fluoride coming into their home. They are severely restricted from going to restaurants or friends homes.
Would Kim Radnell pay the expenses of fluoride-sensitive sufferers here if the mass fluoride program is introduced? Holland tried fluoridation in one section of Amsterdam from 1972 to 1976. A large medical team did double blind tests on people who were getting stomach pains, mouth ulcers, skin rashes, headaches, worsening of asthma and allergies and joint pains. The majority of cases were proven to be genuine fluoride toxic sensitivity symptoms. Fluoridation was ceased.
Australian health authorities, in their eagerness to promote fluoridation, have failed to study the people reporting illness. In 1991, the National Health and Medical Research Council called for these sufferers to be studied properly. It has not been done. In 60 years, the fluoride chemicals added to water in US and Australia has never been subjected to drug safety testing. They would fail miserably if they were made to go through the proper regulatory process.
PAUL SCHUPINA,
Wodonga

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home