Steven in fine form dismisses anything unless peer reviewed and in agreement with his views.
Steve,
Without giving any credence to your opinion of what is “intelligent” or not, since it has been made abundantly clear that you are no authority whatsoever on original thought, I humbly submit my latest video which will teach you more about water in 10 minutes than you ever learned in the fluorescent lit halls of academia which seem to have forever savaged your feeble mind.
Thanks, Corey, but I prefer to obtain my information from credible, reliable, and authoritative sources of peer- reviewed scientific literature…..not from “YouTube” videos and antifluoridationist websites.
Steve
Steven D. Slott, DDS
PO Box 1744
Burlington, NC. 27216
Without giving any credence to your opinion of what is “intelligent” or not, since it has been made abundantly clear that you are no authority whatsoever on original thought, I humbly submit my latest video which will teach you more about water in 10 minutes than you ever learned in the fluorescent lit halls of academia which seem to have forever savaged your feeble mind.
Thanks, Corey, but I prefer to obtain my information from credible, reliable, and authoritative sources of peer- reviewed scientific literature…..not from “YouTube” videos and antifluoridationist websites.
Steve
Steven D. Slott, DDS
PO Box 1744
Burlington, NC. 27216
posted by Bill at
4:12 PM
1 Comments:
"Thanks, Corey, but I prefer to obtain my information from credible, reliable, and authoritative sources of peer- reviewed scientific literature…..not from “YouTube” videos and antifluoridationist websites.
Steve"
Well Steve, your 'research' is amazing, digging up gems that even the most respected institutions have failed to unearth. Perhaps you could enlighten the Cochrane Collaboration then as they have completed an exhaustive search for the scientific evidence of the safety and efficacy of fluoridation and found only three of sufficient merit to even evaluate. Their conclusions support the findings of that previous gold standard of reviews in 2000, the York Review, which also found no credible evidence to support fluoridation.
The "authoritative" sources that you quote are nothing more than endorsements parroted by professional bodies too arrogant or incompetent to do the independent research that the well informed anti fluoridation groups are doing out of concern for the campaign of lies and deceit at the heart of the fluoridation agenda.
By
Carrie, at 14 July, 2015
Post a Comment
<< Home