.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

UK Against Fluoridation

Sunday, October 01, 2006

"GOVT. MUST PROVE FLUORIDATION BENEFICIAL"

Green Health Watch mag. Supplement to edition 30. Received on 30.9.06
"GOVT. MUST PROVE FLUORIDATION BENEFICIAL" (slightly shortened)
If your Area Health Authority (AHA) wants to fluoridate & you wish to oppose it, part of your campaign should be in court. It appears that because of Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament & of the Council of 31 March 04 amending Directive 2001/83/EC:-
Adding fluoride or silicofluorides to water on the grounds they improve dental health makes the water a medicine.
Medicines may not be given until both their claimed benefit & safety have been proven. The burden of proof of benefit & safety falls on the AHA & the UK DoH. You do not need to prove harm. However, you can quote:
Prof. Vyvyan Howard, toxicopathlogist in the Centre for Molecular Bioscience at Ulster University "I'm glad that there now appears to be a legal framework to test the dubious practice of mass medication via the water supply. There are so many unanswered questions relating to the addition of hexafluorosilicic acid to the water supply, particularly to the unborn & infants, that it is my personal & professional opinion that the practice should cease until the basic toxicological resarch required has been performed.
(11980) Alliance for Natural Health.
greenwatch@btinternet.com website: www.greenhealthwatch.com
Ann

1 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home